READ THE WORDS FIRST OF EACH PAGE BEFORE WATCHING THE VIDEOS
5.9.2020 3 Days ago I received news that the vaccine for C19 just killed 4000 people
8.9.2020 SINCE THE START WE ARE NOT ALLOWED TO QUESTION THE NARRATIVE???? unquote...
At long last a confession from UK TV media. (No mate. As humans we are allowed to question everything.)
www.awarriorcalls.com/BITCHUTE
70 AUSTRALIAN POLICE OFFICERS EXPOSE
COVID 19 IS ALL FRAUD!!!!
(must watch video and show police now)
Judy Mikovits tells the truth. I have been studying herbalism since I was 28 and in the books that I have studied confirm the things that she says. To have censored her and imprisoned her was wrong and criminal. The only thing with her is that she does not talk of herbalism as being a better alternative but that would be due to the training she was only allowed to follow.
On the awarriorcalls.com website at the section on page 4 of the COVID Lie sections, it is the video marked 26 that needs to be understood by everyone and then couple it with the solution /
ECHINACEA HERB TEA AND GARLIC as basic prevention and cure.
16 vaccines will kill you otherwise.
https://www.sgtreport.com/2020/10/destroying-the-nwo-
one-truth-will-save-our-world/
THE VIDEOS ON DISPLAY ARE MUTED
BUT CAN BE STARTED BY PLACING
YOUR CURSOR ON THE DOUBLE QUAVER SIGN CROSSED OUT ON THE BOTTOM RIGHT-HAND SIDE OF EACH VIDEO. THEY WILL
AUTOMATICALLY REPEAT UNTIL YOU
USE THE CURSOR AGAIN AND PRESS TO HAVE THE DOUBLE QUAVERS CROSSED OUT AGAIN

WATCH ON BITCHUTE / awarriorcalls / LIVE STREAM THURSDAY DECEMBER 3RD 2020 A WARRIOR CALLS AND NUREMBERG TRIALS

LOVE IS THE LAW
NOW THAT YOU ARE AWARE OF THIS
ARE YOU GOING TO SIT BACK AND LET IT HAPPEN?????
BILL GATES IS FILTHY RICH. HE WANTS TO KILL US ALL ALONG WITH OTHER EVIL ELITES SO IT WILL BE THEM WHO WILL BE USING IT FOR NEGATIVE REASONS.
IT IS UP TO US TO STOP THEM.
MICHAEL JACKSON IS A GOOD ELITE AND THAT IS WHY THEY PLOTTED TO DESTROY HIM.

EARTH UNITED
BILL GATES ETC...ARSE IS GRASS
They have trespassed against us, the people.

They have no jurisdiction
and we, the people,
must learn that they have
committed unlawful conversion
against us, the people,
since, we, the people, were born.

Proof that 5G is going to make us ill

PULL DOWN YOUR GOVERNMENTS NOW
THAT IS THE SOLUTION
Nuremberg Code
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
For the set of guidelines for determining what constitutes a war crime, see Nuremberg Principles. For the denaturalization of German Jews, see Nuremberg Laws.
The Nuremberg Code (German: Nürnberger Kodex) is a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation created as a result of the Nuremberg trials at the end of the Second World War.
Contents
Background[edit]
The origin of the Nuremberg Code began in pre–World War II German politics, particularly during the 1930s and 1940s. The pre-war German Medical Association was considered to be a progressive yet democratic association with great concerns for public health, one example being the legislation of compulsory health insurance for German workers[citation needed]. However, starting in the mid-1920s, German physicians, usually proponents of racial hygiene, were accused by the public and the medical society of unethical medical practices. The use of racial hygiene was supported by the German government in order to create an Aryan "master race", and to exterminate those who did not fit into their criteria. Racial hygiene extremists merged with National Socialism to promote the use of biology to accomplish their goals of racial purity, a core concept in the Nazi ideology. Physicians were attracted to the scientific ideology and aided in the establishment of National Socialist Physicians' League in 1929 to "purify the German medical community of 'Jewish Bolshevism'." Criticism was becoming prevalent; Alfons Stauder, member of the Reich Health Office, claimed that the "dubious experiments have no therapeutic purpose", and Fredrich von Muller, physician and the president of the Deutsche Akademie, joined the criticism.[1]
In response to the criticism of unethical human experimentation, the Reich government issued "Guidelines for New Therapy and Human Experimentation" in Weimar, Germany. The guidelines were based on beneficence and non-maleficence, but also stressed legal doctrine of informed consent. The guidelines clearly distinguished the difference between therapeutic and non-therapeutic research. For therapeutic purposes, the guidelines allowed administration without consent only in dire situations, but for non-therapeutic purposes any administration without consent was strictly forbidden. However, the guidelines from Weimar were negated by Adolf Hitler. By 1942, the Nazi party included more than 38,000 German physicians, who helped carry out medical programs such as the Sterilization Law.[2]
After World War II, a series of trials were held to hold members of the Nazi party responsible for a multitude of war crimes. The trials were approved by President Harry Truman on May 2, 1945 and were led by the United States, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union. They began on November 20, 1945 in Nuremberg, Germany, in what became known as the Nuremberg trials. In one of the trials, which became known as the "Doctors' Trial", German physicians responsible for conducting unethical medical procedures on humans during the war were tried. They focused on physicians who conducted inhumane and unethical human experiments in concentration camps, in addition to those who were involved in over 3,500,000 sterilizations of German citizens.[3][4]
Several of the accused argued that their experiments differed little from those used before the war, and that there was no law that differentiated between legal and illegal experiments. This worried Drs. Andrew Ivy and Leo Alexander, who worked with the prosecution during the trial. In April 1947, Dr. Alexander submitted a memorandum to the United States Counsel for War Crimes outlining six points for legitimate medical research.[5]
The Nuremberg code, which stated explicit voluntary consent from patients are required for human experimentation was drafted on August 9, 1947.[6] On August 20, 1947, the judges delivered their verdict against Karl Brandt and 22 others.[7] The verdict reiterated the memorandum's points and, in response to expert medical advisers for the prosecution, revised the original six points to ten. The ten points became known as the "Nuremberg Code", which includes such principles as informed consent and absence of coercion; properly formulated scientific experimentation; and beneficence towards experiment participants. It is thought to have been mainly based on the Hippocratic Oath, which was interpreted as endorsing the experimental approach to medicine while protecting the patient.[8]
The ten points of the Nuremberg Code[edit]
The ten points of the code were given in the section of the verdict entitled "Permissible Medical Experiments":[5]
-
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
-
The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
-
The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
-
The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
-
No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
-
The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
-
Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
-
The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
-
During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
-
During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
Authorship[edit]
The Nuremberg Code was initially ignored, but gained much greater significance about 20 years after it was written. As a result, there were substantial rival claims for the creation of the Code. Some claimed that Harold Sebring, one of the three U.S. judges who presided over the Doctors' Trial, was the author. Leo Alexander, MD and Andrew Ivy, MD, the prosecution's chief medical expert witnesses, were also each identified as authors. In his letter to Maurice H. Pappworth, an English physician and the author of the book Human Guinea Pigs, Andrew Ivy claimed sole authorship of the Code. Leo Alexander, approximately 30 years after the trial, also claimed sole authorship.[9] However, after careful reading of the transcript of the Doctors' Trial, background documents, and the final judgements, it is more accepted that the authorship was shared and the Code grew out of the trial itself.[10]
Dr. Ravindra Ghooi from India has written a paper on this code and in his opinion, the code borrows heavily from the 1931 guidelines without acknowledging its source and thus could be considered plagiarized.[11]
Importance[edit]
The Nuremberg Code has not been officially accepted as law by any nation or as official ethics guidelines by any association. In fact, the Code's reference to Hippocratic duty to the individual patient and the need to provide information was not initially favored by the American Medical Association. The Western world initially dismissed the Nuremberg Code as a "code for barbarians" and not for civilized physicians and investigators. Additionally, the final judgment did not specify whether the Nuremberg Code should be applied to cases such as political prisoners, convicted felons, and healthy volunteers. The lack of clarity, the brutality of the unethical medical experiments, and the uncompromising language of the Nuremberg Code created an image that the Code was designed for singularly egregious transgressions.[12]
However, the Code is considered to be the most important document in the history of clinical research ethics, which had a massive influence on global human rights. The Nuremberg Code and the related Declaration of Helsinki are the basis for the Code of Federal Regulations Title 45 Part 46,[13][14] which are the regulations issued by the United States Department of Health and Human Services for the ethical treatment of human subjects, and are used in Institutional Review Boards (IRBs). In addition, the idea of informed consent has been universally accepted and now constitutes Article 7 of the United Nations' International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. It also served as the basis for International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects proposed by the World Health Organization.[9]
See also[edit]
References[edit]
-
^ Grodin MA. "Historical origins of the Nuremberg Code". In: The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human Rights in Human Experimentation. Annas, GJ and Grodin, MA (eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992.
-
^ Vollmann, Jochen, and Rolf Winau. "Informed consent in human experimentation before the Nuremberg code". BMJ: British Medical Journal 313.7070 (1996): 1445.
-
^ "Eugenics/Euthanasia". ABC-CLIO. Retrieved 2013-09-16.
-
^ http://www.stanford.edu/group/psylawseminar/The%20Nuremburg%20Code.htm
-
^ Jump up to:a b "Nuremberg Code". The Doctor's Trial: The Medical Case of the Subsequent Nuremberg Proceedings. United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Online Exhibitions. Retrieved 13 February 2019.
-
^ Mukherjee, Siddhartha (2010). The Emperor of All Maladies (First Scribner Hardcover ed.). Scribner. p. 33.
-
^ Annas, George J., and Michael A. Grodin. The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
-
^ Weindling, Paul. "The origins of informed consent: The international scientific commission on medical war crimes, and the Nuremberg code". Bulletin of the History of Medicine 75.1 (2001): 37–71.
-
^ Jump up to:a b Gaw, Allan. "Reality and revisionism: new evidence for Andrew C Ivy's claim to authorship of the Nuremberg Code." Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 107.4 (2014): 138-143.
-
^ Shuster, Evelyne. "Fifty years later: the significance of the Nuremberg Code." New England Journal of Medicine 337.20 (1997): 1436-1440.
-
^ Ghooi, Ravindra B. (2011). "The Nuremberg Code–A critique". Perspectives in Clinical Research. 2 (2): 72–76. doi:10.4103/2229-3485.80371. ISSN 2229-3485. PMC 3121268. PMID 21731859.
-
^ Katz, Jay. "The Nuremberg code and the Nuremberg trial: A reappraisal." Jama276.20 (1996): 1662-1666.
-
^ Hurren, Elizabeth (May 2002). "Patients' rights: from Alder Hey to the Nuremberg Code". History & Policy. United Kingdom: History & Policy. Archived from the original on 7 December 2013. Retrieved 9 December 2010.
-
^ "Public Welfare". Access.gpo.gov. 2000-10-01. Archived from the original on 2012-02-04. Retrieved 2013-08-31.
Further reading[edit]
-
Weindling, Paul: Nazi Medicine and the Nuremberg Trials (Palgrave, Basingstoke 2004)
-
Schmidt, Ulf: Justice at Nuremberg: Leo Alexander and the Nazi Doctors' Trial (Palgrave, Basingstoke 2004)
-
Schmidt, Ulf: Karl Brandt. The Nazi Doctor: Medicine and Power in the Third Reich (Continuum, London, 2007)
-
Weindling, Paul (2001). "The Origins of Informed Consent: The International Scientific Commission on Medical War Crimes, and the Nuremberg Code". Bulletin of the History of Medicine. 75 (1): 37–71. doi:10.1353/bhm.2001.0049. PMID 11420451. Archived from the original on 2008-10-23.
-
Marrus, Michael R. (1999). "The Nuremberg Doctors' Trial in Historical Context". Bulletin of the History of Medicine. 73 (1): 106–123. doi:10.1353/bhm.1999.0037. PMID 10189729. Archived from the original on 2007-12-01.
-
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL No. 7070, Volume 313: page 1448, 7 December 1996.
-
"The Nuremberg Code" (1947). In: Mitscherlich A, Mielke F. Doctors of Infamy: The Story of the Nazi Medical Crimes. New York: Schuman, 1949: xxiii–xxv.
-
Carl Elliot's article "Making a Killing" in Mother Jones magazine (September 2010) asks if the Nuremberg Code is a valid legal precedent in Minnesota
External links
Medical torture
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
See also: Unethical human experimentation
Medical torture describes the involvement of, or sometimes instigation by, medical personnel in acts of torture, either to judge what victims can endure, to apply treatments which will enhance torture, or as torturers in their own right. Medical torture overlaps with medical interrogation if it involves the use of professional medical expertise to facilitate interrogation or corporal punishment, in the conduct of torturous human experimentation or in providing professional medical sanction and approval for the torture of prisoners. Medical torture also covers torturous scientific (or pseudo-scientific) experimentation upon unwilling human subjects.
Contents
Medical ethics and international law[edit]
It is generally accepted that medical torture fundamentally violates medical ethics, which all medical practitioners are expected to adhere to.
-
The Hippocratic Oath makes explicit statements against deliberate harm not in the patient's best interests. These statements are often translated as "I will prescribe regimens for the good of my patients according to my ability and my judgment" and "to never deliberately do harm to anyone, for anyone else's interest." (Note: these statements are formulations of the ethical principles of beneficence and non-maleficence.)
-
In response to the Nazi human experimentation on prisoners during World War II, which were declared at the post-World War II Nuremberg Trials to be "crimes against humanity", the World Medical Association developed the Declaration of Geneva to supplant the dated Hippocratic Oath. The Declaration of Geneva requires medical practitioners to state "[I, the medical practitioner] will maintain the utmost respect for human life from its beginning even under threat and I will not use my medical knowledge contrary to the laws of humanity."
-
The Nuremberg Trials also led to the emergence of the Nuremberg code which explicitly outlines the boundaries of acceptable medical experimentation.
-
Additionally in response to the Nazi atrocities, the Geneva Conventions of 1949 outright prohibits the torture of prisoners of war and other protected non-combatants.
-
The World Medical Association Declaration of Tokyo (1975)[1] makes a number of specific statements against torture, including "The doctor shall not countenance, condone or participate in the practice of torture".
-
Also the UN Convention Against Torture, which applies to medical personnel in addition to law enforcement officers, military personnel, politicians, and other persons acting in an official capacity, prohibits the use of torture under any circumstance. Under Article 2(2) of the Convention, it states that "No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or any other public emergency, may be invoked as a justification of torture."
-
The UN Principles of Medical Ethics relevant to the Role of Health Personnel, particularly Physicians, in the Protection of Prisoners and Detainees against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (UN.1982) applies specifically to medical and other health workers but it has no implementation mechanism to ensure enforcement. It is up to state, provincial, and national bodies to enforce the standards in the document.
-
The development of command responsibility established criminal liability for all people, including physicians, involved in crimes against humanity.
There remain gaps in regulation relating to medical torture in many countries:
-
A higher standard of behaviour is expected of health professionals yet the UN Principles of Medical Ethics are not enforceable when governments are complicit in violations. This higher standard is reflected in the principles of beneficence, non-maleficence (above all do no harm), autonomy, justice, dignity and informed consent and these are not covered comprehensively by the UN Convention Against Torture.
Examples[edit]
-
Between 1937 and 1945, Japanese medical personnel who were part of Unit 731 participated in the torture killings of as many as 10,000 Korean, Chinese, Russian, American and other prisoners as well as Allied POWs during the second Sino-Japanese War.[2]
-
During World War II, the Nazi regime in Germany conducted human medical experimentation on large numbers of people held in its concentration camps. In particular, Josef Mengele's experiments on prisoners at Auschwitz earned him the nicknames "the Angel of Death" and "Dr. Death".
-
During World War II, the Nazi regime in Germany regularly executed prisoners and opponents of the regime. According to some accounts, medical staff was involved in torture during executions. One account of Dietrich Bonhoeffer's death states that, as doctor at Flossenbürg concentration camp, "Fischer-Hüllstrung had the job of reviving political prisoners after they had been hanged until they were almost dead, in order to prolong the agony of their dying."[3]
-
Japanese surgeons also performed vivisection and other medical experiments to torture American prisoners of war in several islands of the Pacific.[4]
-
Between 1970 and 1971, mentally disorienting interrogation techniques were used against interned prisoners captured in Northern Ireland, including white noise. The Irish government complained to the European Commission for Human Rights, who found Britain guilty of torture; however the higher European Court of Human Rights ruled that the British government's actions were "inhuman and degrading but did not constitute torture".[5]
-
In Soviet mental hospitals used to hold political prisoners, very unpleasant medications were given to these "patients" as a means of punishment. A psychiatric diagnosis was devised to describe people who oppose government policies.
-
In 1978, "Pisaot menuh" ("Human Experiments") were performed on seventeen political prisoners held at the infamous prison Tuol Sleng in Phnom Penh under the Khmer Rouge.
-
A study called "The Aversion Project" found that gay conscripts in the South African Defence Forces (SADF) during the apartheid era had been forced to submit to "curing" their homosexuality, both by electroshock therapies and by botched sex changes.
-
There have been numerous claims that electroconvulsive therapy and prefrontal lobotomies and similar psychiatric treatments have sometimes been performed not in the patient's best interests, but rather as punishment for misbehaviour or to otherwise make the patient easier to manage. A classic example of this is the Lake Alice, New Zealand atrocity which occurred in the early 1970s. Children admitted to the Lake Alice Hospital's open child and adolescent unit were routinely punished with unmodified ECT (that is, ECT without anesthesia). Some governments (e.g. Norway and New Zealand) have since begun paying reparations to patients who suffered such treatments. The World Health Organization has called for a ban on unmodified ECT, and states no form of it should be used on children.
-
In 2016, a group consisting of 71 British medical doctors urged that Israel's membership in the World Medical Association should be revoked because Israeli doctors allegedly perform state-endorsed "medical torture" on Palestinians.[6]
Purported medical or professional complicity[edit]
According to the Center for Constitutional Rights' When Healers Harm campaign, health professionals were complicit in the torture and abuse of detainees during U.S. President George W. Bush's "war on terror". Health professionals, including medical doctors, psychiatrists, medical examiners, psychologists, and nurses, have been implicated in the torture and abuse of prisoners in CIA secret prisons and military detention centers, such as those in Guantánamo, Afghanistan, and Iraq.
Among other things, health professionals are accused of:
-
crafting abusive tactics and falsely legitimizing their use;
-
advised interrogators on methods of abuse that would exploit prisoners’ vulnerabilities;
-
using medical procedures to harm prisoners;
-
gauging pain and monitoring interrogations that risked leaving prisoners in need of treatment;
-
checking prisoners to certify that they were capable of surviving additional abuse;
-
conditioning medical or mental health treatment on cooperation with interrogation;
-
sharing confidential patient information that was used to harm patients;
-
covering up evidence of torture and abuse; and
-
turning a blind eye to cruel treatment.
To date, no state licensing boards or professional associations have investigated – or recognized, in some cases – abusive conduct by individual members of their professions. In 2009, after years of denial, the American Psychological Association finally recognized that psychologists had engaged in torture. However, the American Psychological Association has not recognized that psychologists were involved in the Bush Administration’s torture policy. Some criticize the APA for failing to respond to allegations of “collusion between APA officials and the national security apparatus in providing ethical cover for psychologists’ participation in detainee abuse."[7]
Although the American Medical Association has made clear that physicians should not be involved in interrogations of any kind, it continues to insist that it has “no specific knowledge of doctors being involved in abuse or torture,” despite evidence to the contrary, including government documents and Office of Legal Counsel memos, a report by the International Committee of the Red Cross and multiple accounts by survivors.[8][9]
Some other accounts of medical or professional complicity in torture include:
-
The SERE ("Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape") program's chief psychologist, Col. Morgan Banks, issued guidance in early 2003 for the "behavioral science consultants" who helped to devise Guantánamo's interrogation strategy although he has emphatically denied that he had advocated the use of SERE counter-resistance techniques to break down detainees. The New Yorker notes that in November, 2001 Banks was detailed to Afghanistan, where he spent four months at Bagram Air Base, "supporting combat operations against Al Qaeda and Taliban fighters".
-
Confidential medical records of Guantánamo prisoners were used to identify physical and psychological weaknesses that could be exploited during abusive interrogation.[10]
-
A 2005 report by Human Rights Watch suggested that torture was routine under the appointed Iraqi government.[11]
-
Dr. J.C. Carothers, British colonial Kenyan psychiatrist, has been implicated by some recent academic historians in designing interrogation of Mau Mau prisoners.[citation needed] His advice was published by the Kenya Government as The Psychology of Mau Mau, in 1954.[12]
-
Similarly, it has been implied that Interim Iraqi Prime Minister Dr. Ayad Allawi violated his obligation to medical ethics whilst serving as Western European chief of secret police for the Baathist government of Saddam Hussein. However, the same sources allege that Allawi had abandoned his medical education at that point and his medical degree "was conferred upon him by the Baath party."[13]
In fiction[edit]
-
Actor Michael Palin plays a medical torturer in Director Terry Gilliam's 1985 dark comedic dystopian film Brazil.
-
In the film adaptation of George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four the main character, Winston Smith, is subjected to medical torture by the thought police.
-
Actor Gregory Peck plays Nazi medical torturer Josef Mengele in Director Franklin J. Schaffner's The Boys from Brazil.
-
Actor Laurence Olivier plays Nazi torturer dentist Christian Szell in Director John Schlesinger's 1976 Marathon Man.
-
The film One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, starring Jack Nicholson, depicts abuse of psychiatric techniques including electroconvulsive therapy and lobotomy.
-
In the popular series, 24, various forms of medical torture (including hallucinogens and injections) are utilized to obtain confessions and information from high-threat terrorists being interrogated in the fictional Counter-Terrorist Unit (CTU) of the United States.
-
In Anthony Burgess' book A Clockwork Orange, Alex, the anti-hero of the book, undergoes a fictional medical torture program called 'The Ludovico Technique', in which he is given a nausea-inducing drug, strapped to a chair with his eyelids forced open and forced to watch hours of films of extreme violence and rape to condition him to associate feelings of nausea with rape and violence.
-
The theme of the 2009 horror film The Human Centipede (First Sequence) is that of a sadistic, psychopathic retired surgeon torturing three people by surgically connecting them mouth to rectum, forcing the last two to swallow the excrement of the person in front of them and physically beating all three of them if they try to rebel or escape.
-
The 2008 horror film Autopsy focused on an insane doctor who runs a hospital where victims are lured in and experimented with, so that the doctor can find a cure for his wife's terminal disease.
-
In the book Dearly Devoted Dexter by Jeff Lindsay the central antagonist is a character nicknamed 'Dr. Danco' who surgically removes all body parts not necessary for life from his victims as what is revealed to be forfeits in a twisted game of hangman, carrying out the operations with the victim conscious and watching the procedures in a mirror.
-
The multi-perspective novel The Sea and Poison (Shusaku Endo, 1957; translated by Michael Gallagher) depicts the vivisection experiments performed by Japanese doctors on American soldiers during World War II. Kei Kumai's 1986 drama film The Sea and Poison is based on this book (original film title "Umi to dokuyaku").
-
Dr. Jane Payne, a character in the children's book Wayside School Gets A Little Stranger, is a sadistic dentist who pulls more teeth than is necessary in order to get extra money.
-
In the Ajin manga, the Ajins are immortal humans who are captured and tracked by the government in order to become test subjects for medical torture, and many experiments which implies amputations without anesthesia, repeated murdering and torture for studying their immortality.
See also[edit]
Notes[edit]
-
^ "University of Minnesota Human Rights Library -- Links". hrlibrary.umn.edu. Retrieved 2019-08-27.
-
^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2009-04-30. Retrieved 2009-04-19.
-
^ Ferdinand Schlingensiepen (2010). Dietrich Bonhoeffer, 1906–1945: Martyr, Thinker, Man of Resistance. Continuum/T & T Clark. ISBN 978-0-7735-1531-4.
-
^ "Account Suspended". www.crimesofwar.org. Archived from the original on 2008-12-31. Retrieved 2019-08-27.
-
^ "BBC - History - The Troubles". www.bbc.co.uk. Retrieved 2019-08-27.
-
^ "British doctors seek to expel Israel from World Medical Association".
-
^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2009-07-04. Retrieved 2009-06-30.
-
^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-04-29. Retrieved 2009-04-25.
-
^ Hickman, John (2013). Selling Guantánamo. Gainesville: University Press of Florida. pp. 180–181.
-
^ "The New Iraq? Torture and ill-treatment of detainees in Iraqi custody". www.hrw.org. Retrieved 2019-08-27.
-
^ For discussion of Carothers involvement with Mau Mau in Kenya in the 1950s: McCulloch, Jock (1995). Colonial Psychiatry and "the African Mind". Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 64–74.
-
^ "Reporting". The New Yorker. Retrieved 2019-08-27.
Bibliography[edit]
-
Dr. J.C. Carothers, M.B. D.P.M. 1954. The Psychology of the Mau Mau. Government Printer, Nairobi, Colony and Protectorate of Kenya.
-
Carolina Elkins. 2005. Imperial Reckoning: The Untold Story of Britain's Gulag in Kenya. New York: Henry Holt. ISBN 0-8050-7653-0.
-
Steven H. Miles, Abu Ghraib: its legacy for military medicine; The Lancet volume 364 issue 9435, page 725 (August 2004) [1]
Related editorials:-
The Lancet editorial staff, "How complicit are doctors in abuses of detainees?"; The Lancet volume 364 issue 9435, page 637
-
Harvey Rishikof and Michael Schrage, "Technology vs. Torture"; Slate, August 18, 2004.
-
CNN editorial staff, Ethicist questions medical workers' role in abuse.; CNN.com, August 19, 2004. [2]
-
John Carvel, "Abu Ghraib doctors knew of torture, says Lancet report"; The Guardian, August 20, 2004.
-
-
Mikki van Zyl, Jeanelle de Gruchy, Sheila Lapinsky, Simon Lewin and Graeme Reid, The Aversion Project—psychiatric abuses in the South African Defence Force during the apartheid era.; South African Medical Journal volume 91 issue 3, page 216 (March 2001) [3] [4]
Related editorials:-
Paul Kirk, "Mutilated by the military: Apartheid army forced gay soldiers into sex change operations"; Mail & Guardian, July 28, 2000 ]
-
Ana Simo, "South Africa: Apartheid Military Forced Gay Troops Into Sex-Change Operations", The Gully, August 25, 2000
-
S. Predag, South African Gays Terrorized During Apartheid Era; Lesbian News, volume 26 issue 3 (October 2000)
-
-
Ben Kiernan, The Pol Pot regime: Race, Power, and genocide in Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge, 1975-1979; Yale University Press, 2002. pp. 438–439. ISBN 0-300-09649-6.
-
Joost R. Hiltermann. "Deaths in Israeli Prisons." Journal of Palestine Studies. Spring 1990. Vol. 19: Issue 3. pp. 101–110.
-
Elliott Valenstein. Great and Desperate Cures: The Rise and Decline of Psychosurgery and Other Radical Treatments for Mental Illness (Basic Books, 1986). ISBN 0465027105.
-
Stephen N. Xenakis. "From the Medics: Unhealthy Silence." The Washington Post. Feb. 6, 2005. p. B4.
External links[edit]
-
Declaration of Geneva (at foot of page)

This man seems to be winning so 98% of the people on the planet will be killed by vaccines as he said in the
Ted Talk 2010. I hate this man he is a psychopath and you all are not seeing it. You are believing the mainstream media who have board meetings with these people and plan what they will write so you all believe what they want you to believe. Even the media know the pedo organization exists and they also get paid for their silence.
4000 people have already
died from the mandatory vaccines.
STOP THIS PSYCHO BEFORE WE ARE ALL KILLED. HE IS A NOBODY JUST BECAUSE HE HAS MONEY
DOES NOT MAKE HIM A SOMEBODY.
ARREST BILL GATES AND ALL OF HIS DEMON HELPERS NOW BEFORE THEY KILL US. THE PROOF IS HERE ON THIS WEB SITE WHAT MORE DO YOU WANT TO UNDERSTAND THAT THIS IS A SERIOUS TAKEDOWN OF THE PEOPLE OF THIS PLANET.
THEY ALL BELONG TO THE EPSTEIN ORGANISATION AND THEY ARE BEING FOUND OUT. DO NOT ACCEPT THEIR SILENCE MONEY AS THEY WILL KILL YOU ALSO ANYWAY. I HEARD HIM SAY AND I HEARD SOROS SAY IT.
THESE PEOPLE ARE NAZIS.